Topic is effects of remote work on mental health. Previous papers attached and guidelines attached PROJECT 3: MULTIGENRE PERSUASIVE CAMPAIGN AND RHETORICAL RATIONALE (Minimum of 500 words for the Multigenre Persuasive Campaign; Minimum of 1,000 typed, polished words for the Rhetorical Rationale) This assignment asks you to take a stance on the topic or issue that you have identified within your declared, or prospective, academic major. Drawing from your investigative field research and your analysis of the rhetorical strategies employed by your discourse community, you will compose three new genre compositions to convince your audiences to take action. To begin, you will take a stance and develop your argument based on the information you have gleaned from the first and second projects. Then, you will identify your audiences; that is, you will decide what audiences would (or should) respond to your argument. For this project, you are required to address at least two unique audiences. Making your audience more concrete and specific will make your rhetorical task easier and will result in a more successful project. Once you have identified your audiences, you will want to consider which three genres will be most effective for reaching your chosen audiences. Each genre does not need to address both audiences, in fact, most shouldn’t. Your genres are your choice, but this choice should be informed by your analysis and assessment of your rhetorical situation. Finally, you will compose your three genres, developing a researched argument that will target the specific audience you identify. In addition, you will write a rationale that explains the rhetorical choices you made when composing in each genre and how you see those choices as effective for your purpose, audience, and context. You should explain not only what you did but also why you did what you did. Finally, your rationale should evaluate the effectiveness of your choices (as indicated by feedback you received on drafts), acknowledging when something didn’t work as you intended. Documentation Style: The three compositions should use formatting and citation styles appropriate for the selected genres; the Rhetorical Rationale may be crafted using the documentation style of your field be formatted in Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double-spaced. Formatting: You must include all three genres in a cohesive document. Please include pictures of all digital or visual materials and links to any web hosted content. Please refer to the example format on the Canvas modules. You are responsible for verifying that your links work and that all content can be viewed. Final Draft should include: A cover page/table of contents that outlines the issue, stance, audience, and following genre pieces. Three (3) unique genre compositions that you created which address at least two (2) unique audiences. These pieces should be entirely original (created by you). There should be about 500 words between all three pieces. (Some may be entirely visual.) These pieces should address specific audience groups. A 1000 word rhetorical rationale that contains and explantation of your stance on the issue, references to outside research that informed your choices, an evaluation of your design decisions, details on how you approached the audience groups, and careful reflection on the process of composing in multiple genres. Evaluation Criteria for Project 3: Grade Characteristics A The project clearly satisfies all of the assignment criteria. The project directs itself toward at least two clearly defined audiences with a definitive argument. The content presentation is appropriate for the genres selected and the rhetorical situation considered. Adherence to the genre conventions of each adaptation is apparent. The rationale demonstrates that the author made thoughtful, informed choices based on a sophisticated understanding of the rhetorical situation, offering evaluation of the effectiveness of the rhetorical choices made. The prose is relatively free of errors. All drafts are submitted and reasonably complete. There is evidence of revision. B The project satisfies most of the assignment criteria. The project directs itself toward at least two audiences, but either the intended audience or the argument advanced may be vaguely presented in some instances of the compositions. Not all of the genre conventions are observed for each of the adaptations. The rationale demonstrates that the author made informed rhetorical choices based on a reasonable understanding of the rhetorical situation, but the statement focuses too much on process or description instead of rhetorical insight. The are some errors of usage, mechanics, and/or punctuation, but they don’t impede the overall readability of the prose. All drafts are submitted and reasonably complete. There is some evidence of revision. C The project satisfies only a few of the assignment criteria. It may satisfy the minimum length requirement but does so by relying too heavily on templates, examples, or generalizations. The project directs itself toward only one audience or the audiences are nebulous. The audience(s) or the argument may be poorly defined. The adaptations flout some of the genre conventions, rendering an inappropriate response for the rhetorical situation. The rationale lacks insight into the composing process or what the author was trying to accomplish with each adaptation. There are several errors of usage, mechanics and punctuation that impede the overall readability of the prose. All drafts are submitted and reasonably complete, but little revision is evident across drafts. D & Below The project does not satisfy the assignment criteria. The audience is either undefined or assumed to be only the instructor. The position taken toward the issue or the audience is unclear or confusing. The adaptations don’t adhere to the genre conventions, rendering an inappropriate response for the rhetorical situation. The rationale offers no reflection on the composing process or the goal of the assignment. There are several errors of usage, mechanics and punctuation that impede the overall readability of the prose. Drafts may be missing and little to no revision is evident across them.
Topic is effects of remote work on mental health. Previous papers attached and guidelines attached PROJECT 3: MULTIGENRE PERSUASIVE CAMPAIGN AND RHETORICAL RATIONALE (Minimum of 500 words for the Multigenre Persuasive Campaign;