Public Health Systems Case Study For this assignment, you will analyze the case study you selected in this week’s studies. Essential features of a case study include the following: Nature of the

Public Health Systems Case Study

For this assignment, you will analyze the case study you selected in this week’s studies.

Essential features of a case study include the following:

• Nature of the Problem: Statement of the issue of concern, disparities in outreach services to be addressed, and the significance of the problem.
• Stakeholders and Stakeholder Groups: Concerned organizations and groups. Include the dominant values and interests of stakeholders, as well as the common concerns and visions shared among them.
• Alternative Solutions: The primary (2–3) interventions surfacing as candidates for change. Include the strengths and weaknesses of the criteria for judging priorities.  
• Primary Optimal Solution: Essential programmatic and practice elements that could lead to success. Is there a replication of study in other communities?
• Reflection: The advantages and disadvantages facing potential initiatives designed to develop, implement, or assess the proposed solution.

Instructions

Develop a case study analysis that addresses issues and problems related to public health multiagency collaborative initiatives. These initiatives should improve outreach efforts addressing health equity and related issues of system efficacy, quality, and effectiveness.

Your case study analysis will be graded on how well you demonstrate the following:

• Describe alternative solutions and interventions as candidates for adoption.
• Describe performance indicators for judging priorities.
• Discuss how a mission or vision statement was (or could have been) used to empower stakeholders.
• Describe practices that foster collaboration and decision making between diverse stakeholders.
• Describe how specific systems thinking tools can be used to accomplish a public health program’s goals and objectives.
• Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
• Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

Additional Requirements

• Length: A minimum of 5–7 double-spaced pages, not including title, abstract and reference pages.
• Font: Times New Roman 12-point.
• References: At least six references that are in addition to your textbook.
• APA: Format your paper according to APA style. See Evidence and APALinks to an external site..

Note: To fully understand how this assignment will be graded, carefully read the Public Health Systems Case Study Rubric.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save this learning activity to your ePortfolioLinks to an external site..

Week 9 Assignment: Public Health Systems Case StudyWeek 9 Assignment: Public Health Systems Case StudyCriteriaRatingsPtsDescribe alternative solutions/interventions as candidates for adoption.32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes alternative solutions/interventions as candidates for adoption, and impartially considers conflicting interventions and multiple perspectives.27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes alternative solutions/interventions as candidates for adoption.22.4 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes alternative solutions/interventions as candidates for adoption, but the description is unclear or incomplete.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe alternative solutions/interventions as candidates for adoption./ 32 ptsDescribe performance indicators for judging priorities.28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes performance indicators for judging priorities, and identifies criteria, supported by evidence that could be used to evaluate the performance indicators.23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes performance indicators for judging priorities.19.6 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes performance indicators for judging priorities, but the description is unclear or incomplete.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe performance indicators for judging priorities/ 28 ptsDiscuss how a mission or vision statement was (or could have been) used to empower stakeholders.28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDiscusses how a mission or vision statement was (or could have been) used to empower stakeholders, and provides real-world examples of organizations with demonstrable alignment of results to mission and vision statements.23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENTDiscusses how a mission or vision statement was (or could have been) used to empower stakeholders.19.6 to >0 ptsBASICDiscusses how a mission or vision statement was (or could have been) used to empower stakeholders, but the discussion is unclear or incomplete.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not discuss how a mission or vision statement was (or could have been) used to empower stakeholders/ 28 ptsDescribe practices that foster collaboration and decision making between diverse stakeholders.28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes practices that foster collaboration and decision making between diverse stakeholders, and presents relevant evidence to support the contention that practices correlate with effective partnerships.23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes practices that foster collaboration and decision making between diverse stakeholders.19.6 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes practices that foster collaboration and decision making between diverse stakeholders, but the description is unclear or incomplete.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe practices that foster collaboration and decision making between diverse stakeholders./ 28 ptsDescribe how specific systems thinking tools can be used to accomplish a public health program’s goals and objectives.28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes how specific systems thinking tools can be used to accomplish a public health program’s goals and objective and provides evidence-based examples of the benefits the program gained by the use of the tools.23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes how specific systems thinking tools can be used to accomplish a public health program’s goals and objectives.19.6 to >0 ptsBASICDescribes how systems thinking tools can be used to accomplish a public health program’s goals and objectives, but the description is not specific to any particular tool or it is unclear.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe how systems thinking tools can be used to accomplish a public health program’s goals and objectives./ 28 ptsSupport main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHEDSupports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENTSupports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.19.6 to >0 ptsBASICSources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence./ 28 ptsApply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.28 to >23.8 ptsDISTINGUISHEDExhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA formatting of in-text citations and references.23.8 to >19.6 ptsPROFICIENTApplies APA formatting to in-text citations and references.19.6 to >0 ptsBASICApplies APA formatting to in-text citations and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references./ 28 ptsTotal Points: 0