MBBL5014 Business And Corporate Law CWK Individual Assignment | TAR UMT

MBBL5014 Instructions To Candidates:

Students are required to read and comply with the following rules and regulations before commencing work on the coursework assignment. Non-compliance of the said rules and regulations MAY LEAD TO DEDUCTION OF MARKS OR POSSIBLY REJECTION OF THE ASSIGNMENT PAPER.

A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS:

This is an individual assignment.

Plagiarism/collusion

• Student’s work must be originally his/her work and subject to the plagiarism policy of TAR UMT. Students must include the Plagiarism Statement (Appendix B) with the coursework answer.
• Students’ work submitted for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the students’ own effort without falsification of any kind. Cheating or plagiarism will not be tolerated. Any student found to plagiarise or cheat in any part of their assignment will cause their assignment to be rejected and further be subject to disciplinary action by the University.
• Plagiarism occurs when a person copies or reproduces another person’s words and ideas and presents them as his or her own without proper acknowledgement. Thus, plagiarism can take the form of reproduction without acknowledgement from published or unpublished works of others including materials downloaded from computer files and the Internet.

Acknowledgement to the source must be made if students had relied on any sources for information with appropriate reference being made in their work and in accordance with APA Referencing. References from the internet must be from reliable sources. References from online sources that are not reliable e.g. Wikipedia, Law Teacher and blogs are prohibited.

B. FORMAT OF COURSEWORK

Each coursework must include and be compiled as per the sequence stated below:**Turnitin Report – print and attach full pages of the report.**Your Turnitin Report indicator shall be below 30%. **Students are required to attach the originality report for checking on plagiarism. Students who found the draft of assignment has more than 30% plagiarism are required to amend accordingly. Marks will be deducted accordingly depending on the level of plagiarism subject to discretion of the tutor.MBBL5014 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE LAW Coursework 2 Page 2 Arrangement of Coursework after full pages of the report

Cover page:-

Plagiarism Statement – Appendix A;

• Content-
• Table of Content
• Assignment answer
• References.
• Marks Record –

Assessment feedback Appendix B –

The written paper must comply with the following:

• Font type : Arial/ Times New Roman (either one only)Font size : 12Line spacing : 1.5Page Margin : 1 inch (Top, bottom, left and right each)
• Word limit: Assignment not exceeding 3000 words. The words count must be written at the end of the assignment. Table of content and the referencing are to exclude from the word count* your research must be related and relevant to the topic and it is confined to authoritative and related journals.*Irrelevant materials/discussion may cause marks to be deducted ranging from 1-10 for each question depending on the extent of irrelevancy regardless of whether the student’s assignment is within the permitted words/pages limit subject to the discretion of the examiner.

MBBL5014 Marking Criteria

Written coursework will be assessed as below [Total: 50 marks (To be converted into the weightage of 30%)]:

Marks	Criteria	Level
40-50	The write up is exemplary, detailed and clear. Students able to identify the issue correctly and provide a well-structured discussion with accurate application of law.	Excellent
31-39	The write up is good and clear. It contains a satisfactory discussion and students generally applied the law correctly.	Good
21-30	The write up is generally satisfactory but there is some fault in application of the law or insufficient discussion on the points.	Average
1-20	The write up contains misconception, inaccurate or irrelevant information OR no application of law to the case study, OR less insufficient points being discussed.	Poor
0	There is no write up submitted or the write up is totally out of topic.	Non-compliance

A maximum of Five (5) marks will be deducted if students fail to comply with the rules in the assignment.

Do You Need MBBL5014 CWK Individual Assignment Of This Question

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

D. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

• The written assignment deadline is announced in the google classroom.
• For late submission, there will be a reduction of absolute marks from the mark’s score submitted:
• Late 1 to 3 days after deadline of submission: total marks to be deducted is 10%;
• Late 4 to 7 days after deadline of submission: total marks to be deducted is 20%;
• Late more than 7 days after the deadline of submission: coursework will be rejected and 0 mark will be awarded.

MBBL5014  Coursework

As businesses increasingly adopt AI-powered platforms for online sales, warehousing, and logistics, critically evaluate how the Sale of Goods Act 1957 addresses issues related to the identification of goods, passing of property, and risk in automated and algorithm-driven transactions. Examine to what extent is the Act still effective in protecting both buyers and sellers in such evolving commercial environments? (50 marks)

Criteria	Discussion
1. Introduction & Scope	Thoughtful framing of the topic with reference to current technological trends. Defines terms and previews main legal issues.
2. Overview of SOGA 1957	Provides a clear overview of SOGA’s foundational structure and objectives, focusing on Sections 4–6, 18–26.
3. Identification of Goods in AI-Driven Commerce	Links statutory provisions (e.g., ss. 6, 18) with real-world AI systems. Provides examples and highlights legal grey areas.
4. Passing of Property	Clearly articulates the statutory rules and challenges their application in AI-controlled settings (e.g., automatic triggers or machine instructions).
5. Passing of Risk & Allocation of Liability	Demonstrates strong understanding of how traditional rules interact with digital logistics. Shows critical thinking on real-world disputes involving AI errors.
6. Buyer and Seller Protection Mechanisms	Well-developed analysis of seller duties and buyer expectations in the AI context. Identifies protections and remaining gaps without proposing reform.
7. Legal Evaluation & Effectiveness of SOGA	Balanced, insightful evaluation. Discusses consistency of law with business practice, without suggesting reforms.
8. Conclusion	Clear, coherent summary that links back to the