Enns, C. Z. (1993). Integrating separate and connected knowing: The experiential learning model. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 7–13.
You can find a direct link in this week’s Reading and Resources in the Weekly Content section.
Please answer the following:
- Do you think you have an individual or collective learning style?
- Would you consider yourself an accommodator, converger, diverger, or assimilator?
- What do these preferences say about your culture?
- Do you feel you’ve received enough resources to accommodate your learning style throughout your educational career? Why or why not?
Integrating Separate and Connected Knowing: The Experiential Learning Model
In her article “Integrating Separate and Connected Knowing: The Experiential Learning Model,” Enns (1993) explores the importance of experiential learning in bridging different cognitive styles—specifically, separate and connected knowing. She argues that integrating these approaches enhances students’ critical thinking skills and broadens their ability to engage with different perspectives. Reflecting on my own learning style, I find that experiential learning plays a crucial role in shaping how I absorb and apply knowledge.
Individual vs. Collective Learning Style
I identify more with a collective learning style than an individual one. While I value independent learning, I thrive in environments where collaboration, discussion, and shared experiences are integral to the educational process. The ability to engage in group discussions and collaborative problem-solving helps reinforce my understanding and allows me to see different viewpoints. This preference aligns with connected knowing, where knowledge is constructed through relationships and shared experiences rather than solely through objective analysis. Enns (1993) emphasizes that connected knowing fosters a deeper level of engagement by encouraging learners to appreciate and validate others’ perspectives before evaluating their validity.
Accommodator, Converger, Diverger, or Assimilator?
Based on Kolb’s experiential learning model, which Enns (1993) incorporates into her discussion, I would categorize myself as an Accommodator. Accommodators tend to rely on concrete experiences and active experimentation, often preferring hands-on learning and trial-and-error approaches. I learn best through real-world applications, simulations, and interactive experiences rather than purely theoretical discussions. This aligns with my preference for collaborative learning, where I can engage with practical scenarios and gain insights through dynamic interactions.
Cultural Influences on Learning Preferences
My learning preferences reflect cultural values that emphasize collaboration, adaptability, and relational learning. Many cultures place a high value on collective knowledge, storytelling, and experiential wisdom, which align with my inclination toward connected knowing and active learning. In contrast, more individualistic cultures might prioritize separate knowing, which relies on logical analysis and detachment from personal biases. By integrating both styles, as Enns (1993) suggests, I can navigate different learning environments effectively and adapt to various educational demands.
Availability of Resources for My Learning Style
Throughout my educational career, I have had varying levels of support for my learning style. While some institutions emphasize group work, hands-on projects, and experiential learning, others rely heavily on lecture-based instruction and individual assessments, which do not always align with my preferred approach. The most effective learning environments I have encountered are those that balance theoretical knowledge with real-world applications, offering opportunities for collaborative learning, practical experiences, and reflective discussions. Unfortunately, not all educational settings prioritize experiential learning, often favoring standardized assessments and rote memorization instead.
Conclusion
Enns’ (1993) discussion of separate and connected knowing within the experiential learning model highlights the importance of integrating diverse cognitive styles to foster deeper understanding. My preference for collective learning and an accommodative approach reflects my cultural background and personal learning strengths. While I have benefited from some experiential learning opportunities, there remains room for improvement in accommodating diverse learning styles within educational institutions. A more balanced approach, as advocated by Enns, would enhance learning experiences by fostering both critical analysis and relational engagement.
The post Individual or Collective Learning Style appeared first on Academic Research Experts.