HLTH1005 Understanding Wellbeing and Mental Health Assignment 1 Brief

Task Instructions

Part 1: Group presentation

Step 1:
In your groups, using the holistic model of patient care, identify the intrapersonal and extra-personal factors that influence one’s mental health and well-being. These biological, psychological, spiritual and

sociological factors are collectively understood as a holistic approach to mental well-being and informs healthcare professionals with a person-centred perspective to provide the most effective provision of care.

Step 2:
Further, discuss what protocols might be in place in a healthcare setting (either at a system or individual level) to ensure a healthcare setting is trauma-informed.

To do this follow the below steps:

1. You will be allocated into groups of 4 students. This will happen in week 1 and your group details will be accessible in the assessments folder.
2. Each group will need to allocate a member of their group to discuss one of the factors of the holistic model- biological, psychological, spiritual and sociological factors, and discuss one or more trauma-informed care protocols in place for a healthcare setting to be trauma-informed.
3. Each student in a group of 4 will need to speak for approximately 2.5 minutes.
4. Groups with less than 4 students will need to collaborate and discuss all factors of the holistic model together, this may mean that students will be speaking for more than 2 minutes.
5. One group member will need to record, save, download and submit the presentation in an MP4 file to Blackboard.

Part 2: Written Response (750 words)

An essential aspect of trauma-informed practice recognises the prevalence and subsequent impact of traumatic life experiences on mental well-being, therefore healthcare settings need to be safe, inclusive environments that provide tolerance for diversity and compassion.

Choose two of the factors from the holistic model above (biological, psychological, sociological or spiritual) and write a response on how the experience of trauma may impact these chosen factors that contribute to an individual’s well-being. Remember that ‘trauma’ can be defined under various classifications from a single instance or complex. The primary focus of this response should focus on the potential impact these adverse experiences can have on these chosen factors of the holistic model. To complete the written response, complete the below steps:

1.Choose two of the factors from the holistic model above (biological, psychological, sociological or spiritual); and
2.Write a response on how the experience of trauma can impact these two factors of the model
which contribute to an individual’s well-being; and
3.Use at least 3 academic references to support your response; and
4.Use APA 7 referencing style.

Do You Need HLTH1005 Assignment 1 of This Question

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Resources

The following resources will be available to you:

• Notes from Modules 1 to 3 self-directed learning, online learning, and in-class laboratories will assist with this assessment task and report completion.
• Access to tutorial and lab resources are included in addition to time being allocated to prepare the presentation in class time.

Task Submission

Written responses will be submitted via Turnitin activity titled “Assessment 1: Written Response” in the Assessments Tasks & Submission section on the Blackboard HLTH1005 site.

You must label your submission with your surname and initials and the assessment task’s name, e.g: SmithJ_Writing.doc”

Late Submissions and Penalties

As per SCU policy, late submission of this assessment will lead to the provision of a penalty. A penalty of 5% of the available marks will be deducted from the actual mark at one minute after the time listed in the due date. As this assessment is worth 30%, this will equate to 1.5 marks. A further penalty of 5% of the available mark will be deducted from the actual mark achieved on each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero.

Marking and Feedback

Your assessment will be marked by a qualified health care professional. You will be provided with individual feedback in the “Grades & Feedback” section on the Blackboard which will outline your achievement against the listed criteria. Please allow a minimum of 7-working days for marks to be posted.

Assessment Criteria

The assessment rubric provided at the end of this document outlines how marks will be allocated for this assessment. You should familiarise yourself with this marking guide and seek clarification via the discussion board if you need support to understand it.

Description of Grades

High Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Credit:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as better than satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Pass:

The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Fail:

The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.

HLTH1005 Assessment Rubric

Part 1: Group Assessment

Marking Criteria and % allocation	High Distinction + 100%	High Distinction (85–99%)	Distinction (75–84%)	Credit (65–74%)	Pass (50–64%)	Marginal Fail (35-49%)	Fail (1-34%)	Not Addressed 0%
Collaboratively discuss holistic, personcentred  understandings of mental well-being 12%	Meets all the requirements for an HD with no errors.	The group has provided an extensive range of holistic  factors which are identified and  comprehensively applied to promote and/or negate  metal well-being. Examples used are exceptionally relevant.	The group has provided a full range of holistic factors which are identified with one or more minor omissions. Factors are applied to promote and/or  negate mental well- being. Examples are very relevant.	The group has provided a good range of holistic  factors which are mostly identified but with two or more important omissions. Factors are somewhat  applied to promote and/or negate mental well-being.  Examples are relevant.	The group has provided a basic range of holistic factors which are mostly identified with many  important omissions made. Examples have  minimal relevance to promoting and/or negating mental well- being	An insufficient range of holistic factors were identified and none or non-relevant examples were given.	The range of holistic factors are not  identified or clear and lack clear  relevance to mental well-being.	Not addressed/ submitted.
Collaboratively discuss the principles and  practices of traumainformed practice 12%	Meets all the requirements for an HD with no errors.	Principles of trauma-informed practice are clearly  established, examples used are exceptionally relevant.	Principles of trauma- informed practice  are clearly identified with one or more minor omissions made. Examples used are very relevant.	Principles of trauma informed practice are  somewhat established, with relevant examples used.	Principles of trauma informed practice are  superficially established, with examples that are only minimally relevant.	Principles of trauma- informed  practice are not established,  Irrelevant examples.	Principles of trauma- informed practice  are not established. No evidence is available or evidence is not relevant.	Not addressed/ submitted.
Communication and Presentation skills 6%	Meets all the requirements for an HD with no errors.	The presentation is exceptionally well organised, and  professionally delivered with a clear speaking style  and logical organisation of ideas	Presentation is very well organised and professionally  delivered with a clear speaking style and logical  organisation of ideas in the main.	Presentation is well organised, and delivered with  somewhat clear speaking style.	The presentation is mostly organised and  professional, speaking style, however the  organisation of ideas are not logical.	The presentation is not organised  and professional, speaking style  and organisation of ideas are unclear. Presentation exceeds time parameters.	The presentation lacks clear organisation,  the speaking style is hard to follow, and  there is no logical organisation of ideas. Presentation exceeds time parameters.	Not addressed/ submitted.

Part 2: Individual Written Submission

Marking Criteria and % allocation	High Distinction + 100%	High Distinction (85–99%)	Distinction (75–84%)	Credit (65–74%)	Pass (50–64%)	Marginal Fail (35-49%)	Fail (1-34%)	Not Addressed 0%
Discuss the influence of trauma on well-being using the holistic model 7%	Meets all the requirements for an  HD with no errors.	Clearly identifies how the experience of trauma influences two of the factors of the holistic model. Excellent examples are used appropriately within the holistic model. References used are exceptionally relevant.	Clearly identifies how the experience of trauma influences two of the factors of the holistic model. Examples used are clearly linked to the holistic model. References used are mostly relevant and appropriate.	Identifies how the experience of trauma influences two of the factors of well-being using the holistic model. Examples  are somewhat clearly linked to the model. References are fairly relevant.	At least one of the factors of the  holistic model is chosen to describe  how trauma can influence well- being. Examples are somewhat clearly linked to the model.  References are used, although  may or may not be relevant.	At least one of the factors of the holistic model is used, however examples are poorly linked to the model or not relevant to trauma experience. References may be used, however, lack relevance. Exceeds word limits (750+/- 10%)	Factors of the holistic model are not used and are not relevant to trauma experience. References may be used, however, lack relevance. Exceeds word limits (750+/- 10%)	Not addressed
Writing, Grammar & APA referencing 3%	Meets all the requirements for  an HD with no errors.	Exceptionally clear, organised and coherent writing style free of grammar and spelling errors. All citations are in the correct APA 7th formatting sty