Choose one of the two cases that were not assigned to your small group. For instance, if your group was assigned to Jordan, please select Maria from the Rivera Family or Marcus. Closely review the case study and create a genogram

Step 1: Genogram

• Choose one of the two cases that were not assigned to your small group. For instance, if your group was assigned to Jordan, please select Maria from the Rivera Family or Marcus.
• Closely review the case study and create a genogram.
• Upload the genogram.

Step 2: Ecomap

• Using the same case as Step 1, create and upload a completed ecomap.

Step 3: Initial Insights

• In 150 words or less, briefly describe the main highlights from your genogram.
• In 150 words or less, briefly describe the main highlights from your ecomap.
• Identify at least three issues based on what you identified in the genogram.
• Identify at least three issues based on what you identified in the ecomap.

Step 4: Theoretical Framework

• Choose one of the theories that have been introduced in this course and describe in 150 words or less how the theory explains what you see in your genogram and ecomap.

Step 5: Assessment

• List at least five assessment questions that are directly related to your genogram.
• For each assessment question that came from your genogram, describe your rationale for asking it in 2-3 sentences.
• List at least five assessment questions that are directly related to your ecomap.
• For each assessment question that came from your ecomap, describe your rationale for asking it in 2-3 sentences.

Remember

• Include at least three credible references.
• Include in-text citations that conform to APA Style.

Rubric

MSW544_W6_Assignment RubricMSW544_W6_Assignment RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStep 1: Genogram25 ptsExcellentThe genogram is complete, accurate, clearly labeled, and reflects a deep understanding of family structure and relationships.20 ptsSatisfactoryThe genogram is mostly complete and accurate with minor labeling or structural issues.12.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe genogram is partially complete or contains several inaccuracies or unclear elements.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe genogram is missing, incomplete, or lacks clarity and accuracy.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStep 2: Ecomap25 ptsExcellentThe ecomap is complete, visually clear, and accurately represents the client’s ecological systems and relationships.20 ptsSatisfactoryThe ecomap is mostly complete, with only a few minor omissions or unclear connections.12.5 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe ecomap is partially complete or lacks clarity in representing systems.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThe ecomap is missing, incomplete, or does not reflect ecological systems accurately.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStep 3: Initial Insights20 ptsExcellentInsightful, concise summaries of genogram and ecomap. Identifies three or more relevant issues for each.15 ptsSatisfactorySummaries are clear and mostly insightful. Identifies three issues for each with minor elaboration needed.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementSummaries are vague or overly brief. Identifies fewer than three issues or lacks depth.0 ptsUnsatisfactorySummaries are missing, unclear, or do not identify relevant issues.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStep 4: Theoretical Framework20 ptsExcellentThe theory is clearly and accurately applied to both the genogram and ecomap. The explanation is concise and well-integrated.15 ptsSatisfactoryThe theory is mostly accurate and relevant. The explanation is clear but may lack depth or integration.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe theory is mentioned but not clearly applied or lacks relevance to the case.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryTheory is missing, inaccurate, or not connected to the genogram or ecomap.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStep 5: Assessment20 ptsExcellentAt least five thoughtful, relevant questions for each tool, with a strong rationale provided for each.15 ptsSatisfactoryAt least five questions for each tool with a mostly clear rationale.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementFewer than five questions or rationales are vague or underdeveloped.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryQuestions are missing, unclear, or lack rationale.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat1. Answer all questions with explanation and detail.
2. Include at least three outside, credible, and relevant sources.
3. Include in-text citations.20 ptsExcellentAll requirements met.15 ptsSatisfactory2 requirements met.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1 requirement met.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation and Reference FormationUse the current APA Style standards to format citations and references free of errors.10 ptsExcellent0-1 errors.8 ptsSatisfactory4-5 errors.5 ptsNeeds Improvement6-7 errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMore than 7 errors.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting RequirementsCommunicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors.10 ptsExcellent0-1 errors.8 ptsSatisfactory4-5 errors.5 ptsNeeds Improvement6-7 errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryMore than 7 errors.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction0 ptsNo Points DeductedSubmitted on time0 ptsPoints DeductedNot Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day)0 pts