7HURM025W HR Analytics Assessment 1 Brief | UOW
| Category | Assignment | Subject | MAnagement |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Westminster (UOW) | Module Title | 7HURM025W HR Analytics |
| Assessment Title: | Business Case |
| Assessment deadline: | 7 July 2025 |
| Assessment Format: | Business Case |
| Count Words: | 2,000 |
| Date and form of feedback: |
29 July 2025 |
| Assessment: | 1 |
7HURM025W The Assessment
A rapidly expanding medium sized organization is considering incorporating people analytics to inform their HR management. They operate in materials technology sector and develop metals for use in the aerospace, defence and automotive sectors, as well as for electronic and medical devices. They have around 100 employees, mostly engineers (computational, experimental, materials, mechanical and software) and process optimisation consultants. They offer customised solutions for their clients’ most demanding metal component challenges.
They asked you to present a business case for engaging in HR analytics. Employ evidence – based approach to critically discuss the notion that HR analytics is beneficial to organisations.
Word count: maximum 2000 words + executive summary & reference list
Suggested structure:
- Executive summary – summarise the business case including your recommendation
- Introduction – introduce the business case: state HR analytics as the opportunity under consideration & why addressing it is important to the organization; outline the method: EBM principles & evidence weighting; map out the paper
- Analysis: Critical review of the evidence of the impact of HR analytics on organisations
- Discussion of possible options – discuss options for addressing the opportunity. These options should be clearly differentiated e.g. can refer to HRA maturity model
- Recommendation – make an explicit recommendation based on weighting the evidence and organisational context & circumstances. The range of options for consideration: advise for/against implementing HR analytics; if for specify which level would be appropriate for the case study organisation
Link to video assessment brief: University of Westminster
Learning Outcomes of 7HURM025W :
- Formulate business case for HR analytics in a particular organisational context
- Apply evidence-based approach to create insight and develop ideas
- Design workforce analytics interventions to address HR and people management challenges
Do You Need Assignment of 7HURM025W Business Case
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment
7HURM025W Assessment Criteria:
The assessment criteria and weightings show you what is important in the assessment and how marks are shared across each criterion. When you are completing your assessment remember you need to fulfil the brief and the assessment criteria below.
|
Criterion |
Weighting |
|
Clear structure and presentation |
20% |
|
Robust examination of evidence employing EBA |
50% |
|
Viability of the solution |
30% |
ASSESSMENT 1 MARKING TURNITIN RUBRIC
|
Criteria & weighting |
Fail (below 50) |
Pass (50-59) |
Merit (60-69) |
Distinction (70+) |
|
Clear structure and presentation (20% of total mark) |
The business case structure is not adhered to well. Frequent lapses in clarity. Executive summary is not written effectively, vital information is missing. Rather limited or missing outline of EBA principles and of approach employed to evaluate evidence. Referencing requires improvement. |
Principles of the business case are not fully evident. Executive summary could be more informative. Some information on EBA principles and approach towards evidence evaluation. Suitably referenced although minor slips might have occurred. |
Appropriate business case structure. Informative executive summary. Clear outline of EBA principles and evidence evaluation. Well referenced throughout. |
Excellent business case structure. Clear organization and natural flow. Succinctly written but packed with important information executive summary. Informative section on principles of EBA & how evidence will be evaluated. Perfect referencing in the text and in the reference list. |
|
Analysis & EBA (50% of total mark) |
Limited understanding of Evidence Based Approach. When evidence is discussed, it is not clearly differentiated in terms of its strength. Some discussion of the impact of people analytics but not well supported with relevant and reliable evidence. |
Some consideration of Evidence Based Approach but at places simplistic. Evidence of the impact of people analytics has been reviewed but rather derivatively. Discussion of the strength of evidence has been included but not developed in much depth. |
Multifaceted application of Evidence Based Approach. Evidence of the impact of people analytics has been evaluated and some critique offered. Strength of the evidence has been evaluated in sufficient depth but there is scope to extend. |
Robust application of Evidence Based Approach. Strong evaluative and critical approach evident in discussion of the evidence of the impact of people analytics on organizations. Sophisticatedly developed evaluation of the strength of evidence. |
|
Viability of the solution (30% of the total mark) |
Alternative options for the organisation have not been discussed sufficiently. Inadequate appreciation of different types/levels of HRA. Organizational characteristics could be considered further to provide stronger rationale for the proposed solution. Evidence supporting the proposed solution could be articulated more prominently. |
Adequate discussion of the alternative options which includes some discussion of different types/levels of HRA. Some organizational characteristics have been taken into account but there is scope to extend the discussion. Clear rationale for the proposed solution, which is well argued with reference to the strength of supporting evidence. |
Strong discussion of alternative options which considers different levels/types of HRA. Viable solution is well argued for and considers the characteristics of the organization and supporting evidence. |
Extensive discussion of the proposed solution which includes consideration of the alternatives in the form of different levels/types of HRA. Sensible solution is strongly set in the well-considered organizational context. Supporting evidence for the proposed solution is convincing and reveals sophisticated insights |