Assessment |
|
Assessment Type |
Individual assignment / Group assignment |
Assessment Title |
“Human Factors accident analysis and
|
Purpose of |
LO2: Identify the characteristics of LO3: Evaluate the human factors contributing to LO5: Design policies that reduce the
|
Weight |
50% |
Total Marks |
100 |
Word limit |
3500-4000 words |
Submission Guidelines |
· All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with · The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt · Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and |
Due Date |
22 May 2025 by 23:59- submit your report on Moodle- Similarity |
Late submission |
· late project submissions will result in a penalty. A 7 days late |
Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism
|
· Plagiarism is defined as the presentation of another person’s |
Assignment tasks:
1. 1.1 Choose an aviation accident and present the accident case in a brief short paragraph (5 points).
1.2 Present the chain of events that lead to the accident (10 points)
1.3 Identify and discuss the Human factors which directly caused but also may have contributed in this accident (35 points). (LO2, total 50 points )
2. 2.1 The investigation authority has conducted the investigation. After the completion the investigation, the accident investigation authority needs to give some conclusions and recommendations. In your opinion, was everything covered in the report? Did you discover any issues that were not mentioned in the report? What was the reason these issues were not mentioned in the report? (LO3, total points 15)
3. If you had to design polices, give suggestions and recommendations in order to help reduce the human factors that could result into causing future potential accidents, what would those (policies, suggestions recommendations be). What suggestions for changes would you recommend in order to reduce the effects of human factors on active failures? (LO5, total points 25)
This is an individual report. Your report should comprise approximately 3500-4000 words plus appendices and be fully referenced in Harvard style. Marks will be allocated for the originality of your choice of accidents/incident, the breadth and depth of your research, and the style and clarity of your analysis, use of appropriate literature review and the quality and clarity of your analysis and presentation.
Submission Requirements
1. Signed Assignment cover sheet.
2. Report
a. Cover page.
b. Table of contents.
c. Introduction
3. Turnitin report
Sections to |
Description |
Marks |
Cover page, and table of contents and the organization of the Introduction |
Write a Cover page, and table of contents, and Ensure everything |
5 |
Body |
Answer the questions 1 and 2 here |
65 |
Recommendations
|
Answer question 3 |
25 |
Conclusion |
Give an overall conclusion reflecting the purpose of this |
5 |
* Add any other sections as you |
Total |
100 |
Marking Rubric for Assignment-1: Total Marks 100
Note: The marking rubrics varies for each assignment
Assignment
Mark |
90-100 |
85-89 |
80-84 |
75-79 |
70-74 |
65-70 |
60-64 |
<60 |
|
A |
B+ |
B |
C+ |
C |
D+ |
D |
F |
Introduction |
Demonstrated excellent understanding of Human Factors Purpose of the assignment introduction the reader to assignment, |
Demonstrated very good understanding of Human Factors. Purpose |
Demonstrated good understanding of Human Factors. Purpose of the |
Demonstrated fair understanding of Human Factors. Purpose of the |
Demonstrated limited understanding of Human Factors-Human |
Demonstrated very limited understanding of Human Factors.
Purpose of the assignment introduction the reader to assignment, |
Demonstrated poor understanding of Human Factors. Purpose |
Demonstrated unsatisfactory understanding of Human Factors. Purpose of the assignment introduction the reader to assignment, |
Body
|
Demonstrated excellent understanding of Human Factors Depth and breadth of the |
Demonstrated very good understanding of Human Factors. Depth |
Demonstrated good understanding of Human Factors. Depth and breadth of the analysis, analysing the |
Demonstrated fair understanding of Human Factors. Depth and breadth of the analysis, analysing the |
Demonstrated limited understanding of Human Factors-Human |
Demonstrated very limited understanding of Human Factors Depth and breadth of the |
. Demonstrated poor understanding of Human Factors. Depth and breadth of the |
Demonstrated unsatisfactory understanding of Human Factors Depth and breadth of the |
Conclusion
|
Demonstrated excellent understanding of Human Factors Reasonable conclusions and recommendation that address the HF |
Demonstrated very good understanding of Human Factors. Reasonable |
Demonstrated good understanding of Human Factors. Reasonable |
Demonstrated fair understanding of Human Factors. Reasonable |
Demonstrated limited understanding of Human Factors-Human |
Demonstrated very limited understanding of Human Factors.
Reasonable conclusions and recommendation that address the HF |
Demonstrated poor understanding of Human Factors. Reasonable conclusions and recommendation that address the HF |
Demonstrated unsatisfactory understanding of Human Factors Reasonable conclusions and recommendation that address the HF |
Report overall
Mark |
90-100 |
85-89 |
80-84 |
75-79 |
70-74 |
65-70 |
60-64 |
<60 |
|
A |
B+ |
B |
C+ |
C |
D+ |
D |
F |
Cover page, and table of contents and the organization of the /5 |
Outstanding Cover page, table of contents, and organization of |
Very good Cover page, table of contents, and organization of the |
Good Cover page, table of contents, and organization of the |
Acceptable Cover page, table of contents, and organization of |
Fair Cover page, table of contents, and organization of the |
Adequate Cover page, table of contents, and organization of the |
Poor Cover page, table of contents, and organization of the |
Unacceptable Cover page, table of contents, and organization of , or does not exist. |
END of ASSIGNEMENT – GOOD LUCK